Sex. It’s a topic of permanent and universal interest. It’s something that’s on a lot of people’s minds a lot of the time, especially among people our age. So why write about it? There’s not much to say that hasn’t already been said. Besides, there’s only so much words can say on the matter. The rest you have to learn on your own. And that right there is the crux of the matter. If you are Catholic or a product of Catholic schooling, you’re basically left on your own when it comes to sex.

            From about kindergarten to fifth grade, you either believe members of the opposite sex have cooties or you had a close friend or two of the opposite sex and thought nothing of it. Then 6th, 7th and 8th grade hit you like a freight train of hormones. You and your classmates start going through a whirlwind of physical, emotional and social changes that will never leave you quite the same. Your childlike innocence is now gone. You’re like Adam and Eve after they ate of the fruit and realized they were naked.      

            So now you’ve got these hormones pumping through your body, but at least you have plenty of people you can talk to who know what you’re going through, right? Wrong! There’s no chance in hell you can talk to Mom and Dad about it, that would be way too awkward (yet you don’t realize the irony that unless you were adopted, you were a product of your parents having sex). But your teachers will teach you about it, right? After all, that’s their job to teach you valuable life lessons. Sadly, sex education at the middle school level is virtually nonexistent, especially in Catholic Schools. (Note: I’ve never attended a public school in my life, so pardon my ignorance and generalizations). Between 6th and 8th grade, you learn the most about sex on the playground and in the back of the bus. That “one kid” with an older sibling fills you in on all the dirty details. If the only real sex education our Catholic youth are getting is from this amateur Hugh Heffner, then our nation is in serious trouble.

            So then you make it to high school. Those awkward middle school years are behind you, but those “teenage” hormones are surging through your body. Some people start dating. Some people start questioning their sexual orientation. It’s a crazy time. And the sex education is slightly better here, but still not great. A lot of the sex education is aimed at morality, and you are encouraged to ponder it and maybe even debate it, to a point. But then they hit you on the head with “Abstinence only! Abstinence only!” until you are blue in the face. Okay, we get it! We understand the moral arguments behind the Catholic Church’s position, but could you actually give us some scientific knowledge about what the hell is going on “down there” during sex and how the hell birth control actually works. All we know is that there is some magical “pill,” but we are clueless as to what it does. We are told only that it is evil.

            I am not saying the Catholic Church should change its teachings on sexuality. Rather, I think Catholic educators (and possibly educators elsewhere) need to rethink the way we talk about sex in schools. Catholic schools have become very adept at drilling the catechism into their students, but they have dropped the ball on fostering those critical thinking skills. Critical thinking means thinking about an issue from multiple perspectives, not just the Catholic Church’s (even if that is the True one with a capital T). John Stuart Mill once said, “He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side; if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion.” While it’s great that you teach us why the pill is evil, you don’t teach us what it actually does that makes it evil. Wait, you mean that some birth control pills actually prevent the conceived egg from implanting in the uterine wall and that’s bad because we believe that life begins at conception? Oh that makes so much more sense. Why didn’t you teach us that in the first place?

            If we are serious about being Catholics, then we should take the word “universal” seriously because it is the literal meaning of the word catholic. Are we encouraging our students to think universally or just to recite our own stance on the issue? The Catholic Church should fight against heresies and untruths and things harmful to the faith, but we must also remember why we are fighting against those things in the first place, and what is so bad about them. Nietzsche once said, “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.” I am by no means saying that the Catholic Church has become a monster. But if we are committed to teaching a full and unified truth, it means we have to tell our kids what the hell is out there and why it’s bad, not simply to avoid the bad things. By teaching what birth control is, we are not undermining the abstinence only stance of the Church. We are giving them a context to understand why abstinence is the best solution, and not just scaring them with pictures of STD’s. We should be enlightening them, not frightening them.

            So after high school you go to college, and if you thought middle school was full of changes, you are in for a rude awakening. The amount of growth that takes place in 4 years of college is incredible. You grow on so many levels – physical, emotional, social, intellectual, moral, spiritual and last, but not least SEXUAL. College is a time where one discovers and embraces one’s sexual identity. Catholic teens who know next to nothing about sex are thrust into a minefield of booze and boobs. Sex and alcohol dominate the college social scene, which is to be expected given that your body is at a reproductive prime. It feels like you have a million voices shouting at you at once. Physically, you feel the timeless evolutionary need to mate and pass on your genes. Emotionally, you feel the other timeless need to form healthy and fulfilling relationships. You see how this can be complicated when you have people coming into their own sexual identities in an environment where the drink of choice is one that lowers inhibitions and enhances emotional sensitivity? If you are still Catholic at this point, you are probably really confused. You want to know what you should do. If you crack open your catechism, all you see is that it’s a sin to even think dirty thoughts or touch yourself. Well, that’s totally unhelpful! This is the point where one feels totally left alone. By yourself, you have to navigate through a minefield of sex, relationships and alcohol. I say minefield because there are so many bad choices one could make, each resulting in an explosive situation (pardon the pun, I couldn’t resist).

            On average, I would say about 5-10% of my peers are the upright, moral type who would never do anything to compromise themselves. Then there’s another 5 -10% who are going to make bad sexual decisions regardless of how they were raised. That leaves an 80-90% in the middle who could go either way, and it’s these people that I’m worried the most about. Because when push comes to shove, when faith and sex are playing king of the hill, something is going to get compromised.

            If Catholics are serious about caring for college students, then it’s time we start acting like it. The Catholic Church is big on pastoral roles and ministry of presence. The best thing a confused college student needs is some kind of counselor or maybe even a spiritual director. Because when your body is telling you one thing and your faith isn’t giving you any useful advice, you need someone to talk to you, preferably someone who knows what you are going through.

            The only way I successfully navigated the minefield of college with my faith and sexuality intact was with lots of prayer and the help of some truly amazing friends. I was lucky/blessed enough to have friends with whom I could talk frequently about love and sex. One such friend even felt comfortable enough to confide in me when he/she had made a regrettable hook-up under the influence of alcohol. He/she told me that they could not tell their other friends about this because they were too “conservative Catholics” and would judge him/her. This was probably one of the worst things someone could say about a Catholic. Judging people and condemning people for their sexual sins is the last thing we should be doing. Jesus even tells us so directly in the Bible (Luke 6:37-42). As Catholics, we are supposed to be like Christ who ate and drank with tax collectors and prostitutes. We are supposed to welcome people with open arms and embrace them no matter what decisions they decide to make sexually.

            I am sick of the judging/condemning. I am sick of the lack of good sex education in Catholic schools at any grade level. I am sick of people who are too squeamish to talk about it. I am sick of people leaving young people to fend for themselves as they struggle how to use one of God’s greatest gifts to mankind, sex. Yes, I went there.

            It is time we start seeing Christ in one another and time we start being Christ for one another.

Your thoughts?
-Conor Rogers

Katie S.
7/11/2011 11:05:13 am

First off, Conor, kudos for a brilliantly written article and for bringing up a controversial subject that we don't really like to talk about (regardless of how often we likely think about it). I think you have addressed an educational issue that is very important in our day and age and greatly affects the relationships we have amongst ourselves as a society.

There is no doubt that the times have changed with regard to sexual morality. Our generation has been called "over-sexed" and "desensitized" to sexual images and behaviors. While we know the ancient Greeks were fond of erotic metaphors and hosted some pretty willld symposiums, they didn't have Rihanna proclaiming her fetish for chains and whips every time they turned on the radio. So what's my point? The type of sex-education that solely reiterates "sex is bad, sex is bad, sex is bad" doesn't fit our society. It might have back in the day when girls were shut up in their homes and didn't associate with men until they were of marriageable age - usually around 13 - but today's circumstances demand a restructuring of the way we think about teaching children and young adults about sexuality.

Humans are appetitive creatures; just as we desire food when we are hungry and water when we are thirsty, so too do we possess sexual desires that we cannot control without great effort. If you want someone to practice abstinence, you've got to counter with something greater that appetite for sex that is fueled not only biologically but largely also by our society. From a religious standpoint, you must overshadow the mystery of sexuality with something even more mysterious: spirituality.

The problem we run into, though, is that the deep spirituality required for total control of the physical and mental self is one that few young people can achieve (yes, I know there were young saints, but I'm talking your average American young person). At the peak of their reproductive prime and bombarded by sexual imagery, how does a young person compensate for a weaker spirituality that can't stave off the mysterious allure of sexuality? Demystify sex. Prayers and working with spiritual directors would certainly help the larger problem of a spiritual deficiency, but since spiritual depth is something that takes time to develop, you have to tackle the immediate. The Church teaches that sexuality is a gift between a married couple and that it should be reserved for that. Very well... as Conor said, the only way an individual will ever *truly* learn about their sexuality is through the experience of it. The sacred knowledge of sex, though, is different from the straightforward "birds and the bees...and how not to get stung" explanation, and that's what appears to be missing. Maybe if the subject wasn't so taboo, or if young people making decisions about their sexuality knew a little more about what exactly they were deciding upon, it wouldn't be such a huge deal to them and would therefore be less enticing. Deliberate naivete and denial about sex is not the answer, and I'd argue might not be the most psychologically healthy (I promise that's not a personal attack, Tess. I'm speaking generally).

Furthermore, I couldn't agree with you more regarding your point on Christian/Catholic self-righteousness and judging. "Love one another as I have loved you." Love. LOVE. No matter what, and never half-heartedly.

Reply
Tess
7/12/2011 12:13:05 am

I deleted my comment because Lillian said it was too mean.

Reply
Joey
7/12/2011 05:40:58 am

Awww. Tess, you didn't have to delete your whole post. You could have just edited out the "mean" parts. The whole point of this thing is honest discussion.

Which brings me to my other point. Honest discussion is what is needed in something like sexuality as well as many other things, but unfortunately, honest discussion is exactly what is hardest to find. As I said in a response to Conor, the sex ed in Catholic schools might be barren of concrete facts, but on the other hand, the only sex ed you get in public schools is the scientific, clinical kind, with no moral instruction. So the public schools just leave kids completely defenseless on the moral level. What is needed is a combination of the two styles, which means a more honest approach from both sides. But as Conor pointed out, that is really tough to pull of because a) Catholics don't like to change the way they've always done things (unless maybe it's changes to Liturgy, but even that's controversial) b) Public schools are deathly afraid of anything religious sneaking into their curriculum. Both sides are ridiculous in their own ways.

It is completely ridiculous that the public schools are so afraid of addressing any ethical questions for fear of religion sneaking into their curriculums. What I say is, school is about teaching the truth, right? So anything that's part of the truth should be taught. Public schools can't teach opinions as truth, but they can teach what the various opinions are, which is just part of the truth, and let the children decide for themselves. They have World Cultures classes where they teach about various religious traditions, so why not have a Sexual Ethics class where they teach about various traditions of sexual ethics, both religious and secular? By staying away from anything controversial, the schools are not doing the kids a favor. In an effort not to piss anybody off, they leave the kids completely out on their own.

And on the other hand, Catholic schools aren't doing any service to the Truth by completely ignoring some parts of it. Why single out the 6th and 9th Commandments? That right there seems fishy. Why are people so touchy about sex? (Pun intended.) Just because it's a touchy subject doesn't mean the school can just assume the parents will cover that with their kids. If you leave it to the parents, many of them will never teach their kids about it, and many more will try to but will teach it wrong and probably make catechismal errors. So the schools need to teach this stuff. And they would do best to be completely plain and straight about the facts, while providing moral guidance according to the Church. They would even probably be better off if they straightforwardly admitted that there are other theories of sexual ethics (both religious and secular) other than the Church's, and maybe do a little honest exposition on what the other positions out there are, before throwing in their bit about why they are wrong and the Church is right. If they don't tell the kids these things, they're going to find out about them somewhere else. Better to give them the dangerous material in a safe, controlled environment than to let the kids discover it on their own. The bottom line: Kids are expert bullshit detectors. So cut the bullshit and just deal plainly with them. And anything that's a part of truth can't be contrary to the Truth.

Reply
Lillian
7/13/2011 03:08:04 pm

Conor, I enjoyed your thoughts here.

One of my favorite messages: "Jesus even tells us so directly in the Bible (Luke 6:37-42). As Catholics, we are supposed to be like Christ who ate and drank with tax collectors and prostitutes. We are supposed to welcome people with open arms and embrace them no matter what decisions they decide to make sexually." -- and this relates not just to sexuality, but to any wrong a person has done (obviously as long as it's not something that makes them dangerous to be around). I think that that's something that, as Christians, we all need to remember.

I don't agree with everything you said; for one thing, my Catholic school did a great job educating me about a lot of the things you mentioned, including different kinds of birth control, why they are a problem, and what to do about it (ex: Natural Family Planning). But clearly it's a problem for a lot of other people so thanks for addressing it.

Reply



Leave a Reply.