Granted I'm not a PLS major, but I am in fact a good friend of a PLS major that is a part of this group,  Cornelius Rogers.  We've talked now and then about life stuff, and since it so happens that PLS majors are huge fans of life stuff, I thought maybe I'd share a piece of my noggin with y'all.  In order to get my point across, I first must paint a picture of what my life is like on a normal work day.  I was a Biological Sciences major at ND, and I am now working in a research laboratory at IUPUI near downtown Indianapolis.  I am my boss's only employee, and unless I leave the lab, I am the only person I see for 8 hours.  If I am lucky, I will happen to be eating lunch at the same time as another worker on my floor.  Perhaps there are only two other workers on my floor that actually both a) bring their lunch, and b) decide they would like to eat said lunch in the break room on any given day.  So, one could posit that my work life is lonely.  I would comment that my work life is focused.

 Anyway, when I do venture out into the outside world on a normal work day, using IUPUI's shuttle buses to get to and from the main part of campus, I find that my fellow passengers, young and old, are absorbed in their connections to the rest of the world.  These connections in general include talking on the phone, surfing the web, texting, emailing, or simply listening to music.    I am not starving to talk to people, but it would be nice to have a natural person-to-person conversation, something which I rarely find on those shuttle rides.  These trips are only one example of what is increasingly common in our "connected" culture:  a complete lack of connection to others in the physical sense of the word.  I may not feel lonely on these rides, but I am most definitely alone.  

It is a given that a 3G connection will be what we can use in the coming years to stay connected to friends from college, high school, or even earlier, but try as one might, only a small fragment of what friends in fact are shines through in their communications with you.  Nothing can replace the veritable presence of someone else in your physical location, interacting with you, smiling with you, laughing with you.  An "LOL" from a close friend across the country is great, but the laughter of a true friend in person is freakin' awesome.  As social beings, we are bound to enjoy almost any type of communication we have with others, be it person-to-person or person-to-device-to-telephone-tower-to-device-to-person.  Perhaps there is a relationship between the amount of enjoyment one can derive from a conversation and the amount of reality involved in that conversation.  I would argue that there is.  It's kind of like the missing you still feel after a phone conversation with a distant friend.  Because they are there, and you are here, a key component of human interaction is lost.  It's the reason why even the strongest romantic relationships are tested when the two partners are at a distance.  Each member of the relationship really isn't receiving all that the other member can offer, and something is again missing.  

So, my message is this.  If you enjoy fulfilling, genuine interaction with other human beings, you will not find it on the internet.  It may in fact be difficult to find friends in graduate life as genuine and awesome as the ones you found at Our Lady's University, but this should not stop you from seeking out new friends to confide in.  The connections you have from the past should only help you to branch out and find others for your future.

Nathan Hammes

*Regardless of its depth, I must comment that this communication is entirely superficial.
Conor
10/10/2011 06:21:46 pm

Great post Nate! Of course I agree with you that there is nothing that will ever replace the real face-to-face presence of a person. You miss the way they say things in their voice, the little ticks they have, even the way they come into your room and lie down on your bed while you say "No, not on my pillow!"

But I don't know if I would go so far as to say that makes all other attempts at conversation superficial. Superficial of course meaning "on the surface" or "shallow." I believe that phone calls, emails, letters and even text messages can have depth to them. That is to say they can go "below the surface." As Joey recently mentioned in his email to me, "I feel like real letters are somehow a more "human" way of corresponding. When you're writing a letter by hand, you're forced to slow down and think about things more deeply, and it helps keep you to things that really matter, so there's less superficial stuff in a letter." Articulating your thoughts with written words is an art. Some people are better at it than others. Who among us has not had that moment in Sem where you felt like you were onto something but just couldn't find the right words to get your point across? Who among us has not had the joy of putting together a terrific concluding paragraph of a paper, relishing the flow of well constructed sentences?

So while letters may not replace the face-to-face "ubiety" of a person, there is a beauty to a well constructed letter. I'm fond of the one Fr. Sorin wrote to Blesses Basil Moreau on the plaque next to the log chapel. So let's not overlook that beauty.

Reply
Joey
10/14/2011 09:30:30 am

This is too true. I can sympathize with you, Nate, because I have had several such jobs in which I would be working alone for long periods of time, including my job right now. Even though I'm more of an introvert, it does wear on me when I don't have any real human conversations for a long time.

The part about sitting on the bus reminds me of the words to the Dave Matthews Band song "Ants Marching": "People in every direction / No words exchanged, no time to exchange them". I think this is one of the most lamentable facts of modern urban life. Paradoxically, in the big cities it's easy to feel completely alone even though you're surrounded by literally millions of people. I think this is one negative effect that has come out of urban sprawl. In the old days when travel was not so easy, life was based around small towns, or even in cities, it was based around neighborhoods, so you would have real relationships with lots of people immediately around you. Now in big cities, where life is so transient, it's common not to know any of your neighbors, and even in the suburbs, I think it's really easy for individual families to sort of close themselves off in their own little hedged-in house. Of course, I'm sure that rural life can be just as lonely, because you can probably go for days without seeing anyone but your family. I suppose it would depend on the quality of your family interactions.

Conor, I don't know if you've seen it, but there's another great letter on a plaque at ND next to the grotto. I forget who it was written by, but I'm pretty sure the person was dying and reflecting on their time at ND and the Grotto. It's beautiful.

Reply



Leave a Reply.